www.portierramaryaire.com

ruso escribió:Si fusionan los programas no sale un avión ni en mil años.

no tendría ningún sentido, se ponga como se ponga Italia

Milites escribió:A mi modo de ver, es un tema económico y financiero. Es que hay situaciones nuevas.

Con RU (el caballo de Troya) fuera, el peso de Francia y Alemania en la política de la UE es muy determinante. La capacidad de decisión política es muy alta. No olvidemos que esta naciendo un presupuesto de la UE de Defensa, que se desarrollará en las próximas décadas. No es descartable que parte o partes de este proyecto se financien de ahí, y yo pienso que Francia y Alemania lo tienen en la cabeza. Si a esto le sumas que comparten moneda e importante control de las autoridades que controlan la misma, situación que es un momento nuevo, pues más claro. Y si sumas que se te incorpora otro país como España, pues ya ese grupo de tres es dominante. Italia primero tiene que pagar el F35, no veo sus finanzas poniendo millones de dólares ahora en un proyecto monetariamente extranjero.

30 APRIL, 2019 SOURCE: FLIGHT INTERNATIONAL BY: GARRETT REIM LOS ANGELES
...
For Rear Adm Conn, the three top priorities for upgrading the USN’s aircraft fleet are: automation, manned-unmanned teaming and artificial intelligence.
...
By the time 2030 hits, the USN wants to be ready for its next aircraft, says Rear Adm Conn. “Then we are going to have to have a [Next Generation Air Dominance] discussion,” he says, naming the USN programme to find its next fighter aircraft. “The [analysis of alternatives] will be complete in the next couple of months. The report [will be] out this summer, which will inform future choices.”
...

Future US Navy fighter will not be joint effort with USAF
07 MAY, 2019

After developing the F-35 together, the US Navy (USN) and the US Air Force (USAF) are parting ways.

The USN’s next-generation fighter won’t be jointly developed with the USAF. That’s because the USN does not plan to use its Next Generation Air Dominance (NGAD) aircraft on penetration missions in highly-contested air space as the USAF aims to do with its next-generation fighter, says Angie Knappenberger, USN deputy director of air warfare.

“A penetrating fighter, the Navy doesn’t have to do that. So some of that inherent design of the aircraft it does drive costs and if you don’t need that for our mission area then you don’t necessarily want to pay for it,” she says, noting the shape of a highly stealthy penetrating fighter, presumably without a vertical stabliser, would be more expensive to develop. Instead, the USN would conduct penetrating airstrikes against an advanced adversary with long-range standoff missiles or the mission would be deferred to the USAF, says Knappenberger.

That’s not to say that the two services’ next-generation fighters won’t share systems, such as electronic warfare, radar, networking and weapons systems.

“Where we really get some dividends is all of the complimentary systems that we are going to have,” says Knappenberger, adding that borrowed weapons could be especially beneficial. “Anytime we partner with the Air Force and get a bigger stick that’s a big thing.”

The USN’s NGAD is also likely to share systems with the F-35B and F-35C, says Knappenberger.

“It will have to be a complimentary system to the F-35,” says Knappenberger. “It’ll have to be a complimentary system to some of the weapons that we currently have.”

Yet, the USN isn’t quite ready to call its NGAD a sixth-generation fighter.

“Sixth generation isn’t really something that we are using. Our [analysis of alternatives (AoA)] has really gone after capabilities and how those capabilities contribute,” says Knappenberger, explaining that the AoA report was just finished. “We expect the results of the AoA later this year.”

https://www.flightglobal.com/news/artic ... th-457968/

No digo que pasen de la furtividad, digo que le van a dar un valor relativo, y van a priorizar otros aspectos, todo esto según interpreto yo lo que han dicho.