Milites escribió:A ver si Turquia le está haciendo un trabajo de MI a USA, y por ello le permiten lo que le permiten. Aunque no creo que Putin caiga.
Es que he jugado a un wargame de guerra este finde y me flipo.
Enviado desde mi SM-J610FN mediante Tapatalk
EEUU tiene sistemas SAM soviéticos/rusos. De hecho tiene una variante del S-300, y no olvidemos que un S-400 es un S-300 PMU3 solo que se le cambió la denominación.
http://geimint.blogspot.com/2007/08/us-restricted-and-classified-test-sites.html
The radar range near Tonopah is not the only electronic combat facility in the Nevada desert. At 37°18'58.48"N 116°46'50.93"W the Tolicha Peak Electronic Combat Range can be found.
The following annotated image provides an overview of the most prominent features of the Tolicha Peak Electronic Combat Range:
The mainstream belief is that the Tolicha Peak facility houses numerous radar systems to support RED FLAG operations, given its proximity to two mock airfields. A more detailed examination provides an alternative, that of foreign SAM system exploitation and testing.
Elements of S-125 (SA-3 GOA), S-200 (SA-5 GAMMON), and S-300PS (SA-10B GRUMBLE) SAM systems can be found on the grounds of Tolicha Peak.The following annotated image depicts what is likely an S-125 facility at Tolicha Peak. The object to the west of the RSN-125 (LOW BLOW) radar system would appear to be some sort of three-round launcher, or an unusual radar system, and does not resemble the 5P71 or 5P73 launchers found at operational S-125 sites around the globe, and as such may be some sort of dedicated test equipment.
The most interesting facility found at Tolicha Peak is the S-300P launch site. It would appear that a nearly complete collection of radars is present, as well as two TELs and a 40V6 mast assembly. The 40V6 is used to mount either the 5N63S (FLAP LID) engagement radar or the 76N6 (CLAM SHELL) low altitude detection radar on a 23.8 meter mast to provide better performance in areas with varied terrain or vegetation. The shadow cast by the southern 5P85 TEL seems to indicate that it is a 5P85S, complete with the control compartment for controlling the adjacent 5P85D TEL. The vehicle which is most likely the 5N63S engagement radar vehicle appears to have the radar array lowered in the travel configuration. Given the presence of the mobile TELs and the mobile 5N63S radar, the system present here is likely either an S-300PS or export-standard S-300PMU.
No obstante si yo quisiese probar mis aviones furtivos, lo haría contra el sistema Aegis, es el sistema más poderoso contra elementos maniobrables y tiene su sentido porque los sistemas SAM de la familia S son eminentemente plataformas móviles aunque algunas vayan embarcadas, por lo que tienen un precio que pagar por cuanto a volumen y capacidad de sus radares para hacerlas minímamente transportables.
El problema para los aviones furtivos (y para el resto más todavía) no es un sistema en solitario, sino un sistema integrado de defensa, compuesto de muchos sistemas independientes de largo, medio y corto alcance, localizados en muy diferentes ubicaciones y que disponen de un mando de control integrado dónde se produce la fusión de datos. Es ese elemento y no los elementos individuales como las lanzaderas de misiles la clave de todo el sistema.