Moderadores: Lepanto, poliorcetes, Edu, Orel
Lepanto escribió:El centauro no es un MBT, es un vehículo de exploración, por eso lo usa la caballería o su equivalente en otros ejércitos, a lo sumo aspira a cazacarros.
2) Tanks have not become useless, on the contrary, their role in the battle has become more significant, and the variety of the tasks that they perform has widened.
3) Tanks in the AFU are not used like in 2014-2015, when they acted in groups of 1-2 tanks, up to company level (10 tanks). Now the infantry understands how to better employ synergy with tanks in battle (combined arms warfare).
6) Both sides bring back tanks 200-300km behind the lines for repair, the transporting takes 5-6 hours. No one wants to risk the specialists capable of carrying out the repairs, or the specialized machinery needed for in-the-field repairs.
9) The majority of the losses experienced by the enemy occurred because of poor training or foolish logistical managing. Many tanks were captured in mint condition in the middle of roads without fuel.
15) We truly do have 10 atgms for every enemy tank, but they are also used against URALs, BTRs, BMPs, and other cars. The effectiveness/ hit rate of our soldiers is very high, especially with the Javelin, our hit rate with it is higher than the USMC's. The FGM-148 Javelin has shown itself to be better than the NLAW, which have problems with the quality of the tracking components, especially during the winter. It is also better than the Stugna-P, which has problems with components and the rocket fuel, and not always hits at 3750m which the javelin reliably does.
27)We do not need Leopards right now. Send us more T-72s instead. 1-2 battalions of leopards would do more harm than good
28) Re-training of tankers onto western tanks would take around a month, repair crews would need at least 3-4 months.
4) Captured [russian] tanks have shown themselves pretty well, Ukrainian troops have managed to master them and make use of them. In some mechanized brigades there are several companies made up of captured tanks. Many infantrymen have remembered their training on the Desna grounds and happily jumped into the tanks.
8 ) HE [high explosive] shells are surprisingly effective at suppressing and neutralizing the enemy, 1-3 hits are enough and the hatches open, the tank is abandoned, either that or the crew is shell shocked an stays in the tank forever.
10) @oryxspioenkop's list contains 60-70% of our equipment and 50-60% of the enemy's.
11) Captured equipment is not always officially registered, but there is a financial reward for any soldier who captures it same as for any destroyed equipment.
13) 90% of T-80BVMs have been destroyed, there are still T-72B3s and T-72B3MS, up to 900 tanks of these types have been lost, 800 remain, but there are problems with training crews for these. This is why T-62s and old models of T-72s and T-80s have been brought out of service there are elderly volunteers who served on them.
18) On the modern tanks of the enemy there are huge pieces of glass on sights and observation view ports, which can easily be destroyed by firearms of caliber 5.45 to 12.7 from distances up to 800m. Tankers aim for the view port of the enemy driver. On the side of the tank there is a strip 30mm thick and 30cm high from the bottom of the tank, where the magazine is located.
20) The transporting of our tanks into Europe is a significant help, a single factory is able to repair 20-30 written off tanks per month. They have a large supply of specialists. In total we get back 2-3 tank companies every month.
23) NATO countries do not need a lot of tanks, by the time they get to the battlefield Russia will not have any tanks left.
dejece escribió:Los italianos tienen el peor MBT de la OTAN ,espero que le metan la torre del leo 2 preferiblemente a5 en adelante
Usuarios navegando por este Foro: No hay usuarios registrados visitando el Foro y 0 invitados